Wicely

Head to head

Innguma vs Wicely

Innguma is a mature technology-watch and competitive-intelligence platform with broad source coverage and an analyst-and-reader role model. It is structurally embedded across the Mondragón cooperatives, where it ships as the group-default tool, and across multi-sector industrial, banking, healthcare, food and services deployments.

The short version

The two tools solve different halves of the same problem. Innguma is a mature, broad-coverage technology-watch platform built to be run by dedicated analysts who configure sources and interpret the resulting dashboards. Wicely is an AI-native platform that hands back finished, scored conclusions with no one needed to run searches.

Choose Innguma if

You staff dedicated intelligence analysts, want a mature multi-sector suite with very broad source coverage, and operate inside or near the Mondragón cooperative cluster where Innguma is the group-default tool.

Choose Wicely if

You want scored conclusions and action points delivered in your own language, rather than dashboards and classified news to interpret: Wicely runs the watch itself, so no one spends their week configuring and filtering.

Feature comparison

CapabilityInngumaWicely
CoverageBroad: web, social, patents, tendersPatents, papers, news - agentic live search
Source discoveryAI source gen, analyst configuresAuto-finds sources per vertical
OutputClassified news + dashboards to readBriefings + scored action points
Effort to operateAnalyst-run, configure + filterMinimal, no analyst
MonitoringContinuous 24/7, analyst-configuredNative continuous autopilot
Source traceabilityDashboards/newsletters of findingsEvery finding links to source
AI approachEstablished AI bolted on legacyAI-native, analysis is product
LanguagesES/EN/EU UI, auto-translates sourcesDelivered in your language
Specialist depthMature full multi-sector suiteFocused on your business line

How they compare, point by point

Output

Innguma

Innguma delivers classified news, structured feeds and dashboards that a person then reads and interprets. The platform organizes and surfaces the findings, but turning them into a conclusion is left to the reader.

Wicely

Wicely delivers finished briefings with executive summaries and action points, each scored 0 to 100 for relevance to a specific business line. The conclusion is the product, not raw material to interpret.

Effort to operate

Innguma

Innguma is designed to be analyst-run. Someone configures the sources, runs the searches and filters the results, which is exactly the bottleneck that stops a small team from getting value.

Wicely

Wicely is built to run with minimal effort and no dedicated researcher. You describe your business line in plain language and the platform does the configuring, watching and filtering for you.

Monitoring

Innguma

Innguma monitors continuously, around the clock, once an analyst has configured what to watch. The continuous watch is real, but it depends on that upfront and ongoing analyst configuration.

Wicely

Wicely runs continuous monitoring as a native autopilot. The watch runs on its own per business line without a person configuring and maintaining the source set.

Source traceability

Innguma

Innguma presents findings through dashboards and newsletters. The findings are surfaced and organized and the underlying items are accessible, but the experience centers on the dashboard view rather than a tight click-through from each conclusion to its source.

Wicely

Wicely links every finding back to its original source alongside the reasoning, so the reviewer can click through and verify each conclusion rather than trust a summary.

Languages

Innguma

Innguma runs a trilingual interface across Spanish, English, and Basque and translates source material automatically, but what it hands back is still analytics and classified news for someone on the team to read and interpret.

Wicely

Wicely reads sources in any language and delivers the conclusions themselves in your team's own language, so the output arrives ready to use rather than as translated material to work through.

Specialist depth

Innguma

Innguma is a mature, full multi-sector suite with years of operational deployments and a very broad surveillance feature set built up over a long history in the category.

Wicely

Wicely is built around your business line: it monitors the patents, papers, and news that matter to it and delivers scored conclusions, instead of reproducing a multi-sector platform's full feature set. Innguma's breadth is real and mature. Wicely's bet is that a modern, focused watch covers the need without the platform around it.

Strengths and limitations

Where Innguma is strong

  • Mature, broad-coverage platform with very wide source ingestion across web, social, video, patents, tenders, regulations and subsidies, backed by many search engines and a mobile app.
  • A deep structural position inside the Mondragón cooperative cluster, where it is the group-default tool and the first reference point in any Mondragón account.
  • An established AI and machine-learning layer for the category, including news classification by sentiment, AI-assisted source generation, rule creation and auto-generated summaries.
  • A clear analyst-and-reader role model with automatic newsletter distribution and a shared library, proven in operational multi-sector deployments.
  • Continuous round-the-clock monitoring once an analyst has configured the sources and filters to watch.

Where Wicely does more

  • Innguma hands back classified news and dashboards for someone to read and interpret, whereas Wicely delivers finished briefings with executive summaries and action points scored 0 to 100 for relevance to a specific business line.
  • Innguma is built to be run by a dedicated analyst who configures sources, runs searches and filters results, whereas Wicely runs on autopilot with no analyst required.
  • Without per-business-line scoring, a broad watch can surface a lot of irrelevant noise for a niche domain, whereas Wicely scores each finding against the specific product line so the team reads the fraction that matters.
  • Innguma surfaces findings through dashboards and newsletters, whereas Wicely links every finding back to its original source alongside the reasoning behind it.
  • Innguma offers a trilingual interface and automatic source translation, but it hands back classified news and analytics for someone to interpret, whereas Wicely reads sources in any language and delivers the conclusions themselves in your team's own language.

Pricing

Innguma

The Business plan is published at 3,564 EUR per year, covering three analyst users plus unlimited readers, with additional analyst users at 99 EUR per month. The Corporate plan, which adds a custom portal, access control and database connections, is quote-only through sales.

View pricing source

Wicely

Wicely publishes simple usage-based pricing: a monthly base plan that includes three reports, plus a fixed monthly amount per additional report, with unlimited read users. Because it automates the manual research work rather than adding a tool someone operates, teams weigh it against the analyst hours and external research reports it saves, not against a per-seat license.

See Wicely's pricing

How to switch from Innguma

Moving to Wicely does not require a migration project. Here is how teams make the change.

  1. Step 1

    Describe your business line in plain language

    Instead of configuring search engines, sources and filters by hand, you describe your technology or product line in plain language and Wicely proposes the map of what to watch. No analyst setup required.

  2. Step 2

    Replicate your scouting scope

    Carry over the topics, competitors and technology areas Innguma was watching for you. Wicely auto-discovers the relevant sources per area so you cover the same ground without rebuilding query logic.

  3. Step 3

    Receive scored conclusions, not dashboards

    Where Innguma delivered classified news and dashboards to read, Wicely delivers briefings with executive summaries and action points scored 0 to 100 for relevance, each linked back to its source in your own language.

  4. Step 4

    Run both in parallel before switching

    Keep Innguma running while Wicely produces its first recurring reports. Compare the output side by side, confirm the relevance scoring and traceability hold up for your domain, then retire the analyst-run workflow when you are ready.

The verdict

Innguma is a strong fit for an organization that already staffs dedicated intelligence analysts and wants a mature, broad-coverage platform to run, especially inside the Mondragón cooperative cluster where it is the default. Wicely is the better fit when you want scored conclusions in your own language rather than dashboards to interpret: Wicely runs the watch itself, so your team reads results instead of gathering them, and analysts are freed from configuring and filtering.

Frequently asked questions

Is Wicely a replacement for Innguma?
It can be, but they take different approaches. Innguma is a mature platform for organizations that staff analysts to run it. Wicely delivers the conclusions ready to use, with no operator required: it runs the watch itself, and any analyst on the team hands over the configuring and filtering. If your constraint is staff time rather than tooling, Wicely is the more natural fit.
Does Innguma do continuous monitoring?
Yes. Innguma monitors continuously, around the clock, once an analyst has configured the sources and filters to watch. The difference with Wicely is who maintains that configuration: Wicely runs the watch as a native autopilot per business line without an analyst maintaining the source set.
We are a Mondragón cooperative already using Innguma. Why look at Wicely?
Innguma is the group-default tool and a genuinely mature platform, so this is not about replacing a weak product. The question is operational fit: Wicely delivers scored conclusions and action points instead of dashboards to interpret, with no analyst needed to configure searches and filter results, which can reach teams that the analyst-run model leaves underserved.
How does Wicely handle relevance better than a broad watch?
A very broad watch can surface a lot of noise for a niche domain because results are not scored against your specific product line. Wicely scores every finding 0 to 100 for relevance to that specific line, so the team reads the small fraction that matters rather than filtering everything by hand.
What about languages?
Innguma offers a trilingual interface across Spanish, English, and Basque and auto-translates source material, but the output is still classified news to read and interpret. Wicely reads sources in any language and delivers the conclusions themselves in your team's own language, so the output arrives ready to use.

Still weighing your options?

This is a one-to-one comparison. If you are still surveying the field, it is worth seeing how the other tools stack up before you decide.